![]() At the time of this writing, there’s virtually no production-safe way to process inline styles. The CSS pre-/post-processing ecosystem largely relies on separate style sheets, where it brings the most value. While you could technically write tools to process inline styles within HTML, none of the existing mature tools provides any official and actively maintained solution for that. It uses several PostCSS plugins itself, such as PurgeCSS to drop unused classes at build-time, or postcss-selector-parser in their JIT compiler. Tailwind CSS, the leading utility-first framework, was designed to work primarily as a PostCSS plugin. The programmatic capabilities of pre-processors help write utility classes more efficiently. For example, they can declare styles for pseudo-classes and elements.on-hover \ :text-darkblue:hover They have access to the same powerful features as any other CSS class. It cuts you from writing styles for pseudo-classes and elements, more complex selectors using combinators, media queries, or animations.Ĭonversely, utility classes live in style sheets. ![]() You’re not in a style sheet or within an embedded block, meaning you can’t write selectors. This is because you can only declare styles, not rules. The inheritable color property affects any child element which doesn’t explicitly declare the property itself.Īside from that, inline styles only have a local impact. His discovery leads him on a quest toįind Rick Deckard (Harrison Ford), a former blade runner who's been Officer K (Ryan Gosling), a new blade runner for the Los Angeles Policeĭepartment, unearths a long-buried secret that has the potential to plunge They can impact children if they declare an inheritable property. This is a crucial difference with utility classes.Īs with any CSS declaration, inline styles are subject to inheritance. Perhaps the biggest limitation with inline styles is that they can only affect the element they’re on. Inline styles only apply to the elements they’re declared on But persisting falsehoods remind us that nothing is ever obvious, and we should come up with better explanations on why utility classes and inline styles don’t compare, despite bearing a vague resemblance. At the time, it seemed like the easiest one to rectify, the one that would soon disappear because of how easy it was to expose. In my 2018 article, I touched on this specific belief among many others. And by far, the most tired, overused cliché is that utility classes are just inline styles. But despite numerous attempts at debunking common fallacies, utility-first enthusiasts keep on having to reply to a staggering amount of misconceptions. ![]() Healthy debate contributes to identifying weaknesses and fueling growth, while indifference would let it stagnate and die.Īs an early-defender of utility-first CSS ( video version), I love reading constructive critiques that challenge my views and get my problem-solving juices flowing. It’s a good thing: polarized opinions mean topics matter enough for people to care. With success comes many adepts but also a fair share of criticism. However, text-overflow has a serious limitation: it only works on a single line of text.Half a decade after the first commit of the pioneering ACSS, utility-first CSS is more popular than ever. You can subscribe to the podcast on iTunes, Youtube, Spotify, or your favorite podcast app.Īs of today, this is what we – David and Sagi – are doing FULL TIME.ĬSS3 gave us the wonderful property, text-overflow, which can do things like create ellipsis and gracefully cut off words. Sagi has launched a podcast and community of online entrepreneurs called Mindful
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
Details
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |